|
|
THREE Coach Royal A national championship bought you only so much time at the University of Texas, and by the spring of 1968 Darrell Royal was five years removed from
coaching the Longhorns to an undefeated season and the No. 1 ranking. That 1963 defense, led by sophomore
linebacker Tommy Nobis and senior defensive lineman Scott Appleton, was dominating. The Longhorns lost their best offensive threat, halfback Ernie Koy, to a shoulder separation at midseason,
and still went undefeated and beat Roger Staubach and the Navy Midshipmen in the Cotton Bowl. The national
championship came in Royal’s seventh season in Austin, when he was only thirty-nine.
Yet that raised the standards even higher. More than ever, winning at Texas didn’t mean winning seasons,
it meant dominating the Southwest Conference and lording it over every one of the six other Texas-based
schools in the league. It meant providing the best punchlines of all for Texas Aggie jokes (e.g.,
“27–0”). It meant going to the Cotton Bowl every January 1 and landing virtually every
high school prospect the Longhorns sought in the state, whether the prospect was going to play or ultimately
just be kept away from Texas Tech or Southern Methodist or even Rice. And it meant beating the Big Eight Conference’s Oklahoma Sooners every year in the heated Red River rivalry in Dallas,
enabling the UT boosters to continue forgiving Royal for being an “Okie.”
The Longhorns’ coach had been forced to grow up fast in Hollis, Oklahoma. His mother, Katy, died
in October 1924, when Darrell—her sixth child—was only three months old. When he was sixteen,
his father moved the family to California. Darrell hated the West Coast and got permission from his
dad, Burley Ray, to return to Oklahoma on his own. After his high school graduation in Hollis, Darrell
had an offer to play football at Oklahoma, but he went into the Army Air Corps in 1943 and eventually was
trained as a tail gunner on a B-24 bomber. His crew was held back from being sent overseas to be trained for photo reconnaissance missions, and he still was in the United States when the war ended. In the fall of 1945, he played for the Third Air Force football team, based in Tampa, and was heavily re-recruited
by the college coaches. He was a prized prospect, although he weighed only 158 pounds,
and he went to OU to play for Jim Tatum. As a senior All-American quarterback in 1949, Royal was twenty-five
years old and playing under Tatum’s young successor, Bud Wilkinson. To the press, Wilkinson touted
his quarterback as a heady coaching candidate, and writers willingly ran with the suggestion, as when Walter Stewart
of the Memphis Commercial-Appeal
wrote after the 1950 Sugar Bowl that Royal
“owns one of the most brilliant masses of football cerebellum we’ve seen caged in one skull.
. . . [T]hat night, he gave us a clinical critique which was magnificently lucid and economically complete. He’ll make someone a game-winning coach.” Royal’s first college
job was as an assistant at North Carolina State in 1950. In 1973’s The Darrell Royal Story, author Jimmy Banks wrote that even before Royal was on the sideline for his first game, he considered quitting
the business because he discovered he was petrified of public speaking, which was part of the job for even
assistant coaches. As dynamic as he could be in informal situations, or with small groups, standing on
a podium was torture for him at first. But he managed to keep his poise and get through
a lecture about his experiences as a Split-T quarterback, and about the offense itself, at a coaching clinic
on the University of Tennessee campus that July, and the big-name coaches in attendance—familiar
with him as a quarterback—found they agreed with the Memphis columnist’s assessment.
Royal was stamped as a hot coaching prospect before he had coached in a game, and his knowledge of the
hot offense of the period— the Split-T—was coveted. After that
season, Tulsa coach Buddy Brothers offered Royal a raise and a promotion to a No. 1 assistant’s job,
and Royal verbally accepted it. Before he signed a contract, though, BudWilkinson called and offered him
a job on the OU staff. Royal wanted to take it, but when Brothers made it clear he believed Royal
would be going back on his word, the young coach swallowed hard and went to Tulsa. As it turned out, Royal
loved the experience, because Brothers allowed him—a college QB only two seasons earlier—complete freedom to run the offense, and the Hurricanes lost only once. Royal’s bona fides as
a precocious coach were solidified, and Mississippi State coach Murray Warmath hired him away. Then Royal took the unusual step of accepting
the head job with the Edmonton
Eskimos of the Canadian Football League’s forerunner, the Western Interprovincial
Football Union—for a garish $13,500. North of the border, football was a game of limited resources,
twelve players, legal forward motion at the snap, a 55-yard line, and a “rouge” single point
when the opposition couldn’t get the ball out of the end zone. It also was Royal’s chance to get his legs as a head coach, and the Eskimos were 17–5. Royal cited the experience when
he talked with Mississippi State about returning—this time as the head coach. He went 12–8
in two seasons in Starkville, then 5–5 in a salmon-out-of-water season at the University ofWashington
in 1956. When the Texas job opened up, Royal left Washington with three years remaining on
his contract and became the Longhorns’ head coach in 1957—a year ahead of Frank Broyles’s
move to Arkansas. Royal was 17–13 as a college head coach when he went to Texas, but he was only
eight seasons removed from being an All-American quarterback and had only solidified his image as an offensive genius. One of the naïve assumptions in sports, whether expressed
in the media or in the casual chatter of fans, is that players on any team have a monolithic, easily summarized opinion of their coach. Particularly in the late 1960s, it was difficult to be
a beloved and winning college football head coach at the same time. Some of the best molders of young men
and best-loved coaches weren’t aloof and did heavily invest their
emotions in their players. But that could eat them up, and when they were fired or they resigned, it could be said:
Just not tough enough to be a great head coach. Above all, it was—and
is—perilous to overgeneralize, even about Frank Broyles. That said, summarizing the players’
views of the Arkansas coach for the most part painted a fair picture. With Royal at Texas, it was far more complex. The Longhorns felt a mixture of fear, respect, hatred, anger, confusion, and reverence—and
all of those emotions could swirl within one player. Over the years, those who stuck it out in the Royal
program tended to forget the rest and remember the respect, and add to it. It’s a fair exchange:
If they stuck with Royal, he stuck with them, moving mountains for his former players
over the years. “If
he never said your name the entire time, you’d be very happy,” 1969 guard Mike Dean says of him. “You were scared to death
of him, literally scared to death of him. I don’t know anybody who wasn’t scared to death.
Afterward, I realized what he was doing. He told me one time that he practiced a system
he called intermittent reinforcement. You never knew if he liked you or he didn’t like you. He told
me, ‘If I was down on you all the time, you’d quit the team. If all I did was praise you, you’d
let up.’ You never knew where you stood with him. One day he would praise you and the next day he’d make you feel like a piece of dirt. Because of this, we all feared him. To be honest,
we didn’t really like him. We certainly respected him. I love the man now, but at the time, I just
knew if he said my name, it wasn’t going to be good.” Linebacker
Scott Henderson, a junior in 1969, says of Royal, “Some people thought he was ruthless. Some people
thought he was unfair. I always found him to be fair—tough, but fair.”
Tight end Randy Peschel says Royal “was a psychologist and motivator second to none. He knew what
buttons to push to get you to do what you needed to. I know my appreciation grew for him exponentially
after I was done. Maybe others did, but I know I didn’t realize at the time what he was doing
and how he was doing it and how he was helping me and all of us as a team.”
Royal, meanwhile, earned his players’ complicated opinion of him by overseeing a sometimes brutal
regimen: The “shit” treatment for the scrubs in the Texas program, involving extra practice
work, wasn’t unique in college football in the 1960s, and it generated bitterness in those who felt
they were being punished—or run off. The Monday “Turd Bowls,” matching those who
hadn’t played on Saturday against the freshmen, were legendary for both their sharp-edged competitiveness
and their implicit punishment. The upperclassmen were angry at having to play on Mondays and not Saturdays. “It was the freshmen against everybody in the world,” says 1969 All-American tackle
Bob McKay, who went through the Turd Bowls as a freshman in 1966. “The sophomores were the worst
because they had just gotten out of it, and they treated you like shit anyway. They just took delight in
trying to kick your ass, so you had to learn pretty quick that you had to stand up for yourself,
and the only friends you had were the other freshmen.” Similarly infamous were the off-season
conditioning drills under veteran trainer
Frank Medina—drills that some players concluded were tougher for the marginal players. “Medina was somewhat of a henchman,” guard
Bobby Mitchell says. “He was running people off, really.” Others thought Medina’s workout program was egalitarian hell. “He was the one who kept us in shape,” Mike
Dean says. “We were in incredible shape and he deserves some credit for our success.” Regardless,
Medina considered the workouts biblical trials, challenging the Longhorns to measure their faith. It also
was rationalized as a Darwinian test in a tough sport: Only the strong would survive, and maybe
they even would contribute to the program. If they stuck it out but didn’t play, they still would
be stronger and better men for it, wouldn’t they? And if they didn’t survive, if they quit
or dropped out of the program, they weren’t strong enough to be missed. That’s just
how it was. The
numbers game was cold: Texas annually
brought in about fifty scholarship
freshman players, the elite of the state’s prospects. Even when the lack of a ceiling on the total
number of scholarship players in the program lessened the need for attrition, the numbers were unmanageable
if all the scholarship players remained in the program. If they left cussing your program,
that wasn’t a tragedy. They hadn’t been playing for anyone else in the league. If they transferred,
it often was to where they could play right away, and that wasn’t possible within the Southwest Conference
because of the transfer rules. It’s naïve to assume that everyone who left did so only or even
primarily because of the physical rigors; players didn’t like seeing their name on a little circular
disk hanging in the seventh slot below the position name on the depth chart board, and they often wanted
to go somewhere they could play. Or they decided to end their college football careers on the spot. But if they stayed with Royal and the Longhorns, they knew they were subject to exhausting
physical workouts and caustic reviews. “When Coach Royal came off his tower at practice,
you hoped to hell he turned right because that meant the defense screwed up and it wasn’t us,” McKay says. “The thing is, it was a different time. We didn’t ask questions. When
we were told to do something . . . hell, there were three hundred people on the field at any one time.
If you didn’t like the way things were going, they didn’t give a shit, you were more than welcome to leave. It wasn’t, ‘Well, do we think this is going to work,
do we really want to do this?’ It wasn’t up for discussion.” As
the head of that Texas program, Royal was
universally respected, if the definition included the understanding
that he was the supreme power. When the Longhorns gathered on Sunday to watch game film as a full team, there was plenty of collegial chatter in the room as players filed in, sat down, and waited.
Then, as Royal walked in from the back, the silence followed him up the aisle like a wave, until those
in the first few rows sensed it and shut up even before the coach passed them.
And the odds were pretty strong that none of the players in the room would have a personal conversation
with Royal any time soon. In Fayetteville, Frank Broyles seemed uncomfortable with closeness; in Austin,
Darrell Royal seemed disdainful of it. Everyone understood that, including Bob McKay
and defensive tackle Leo Brooks, both stars. “A guy from a newspaper out in West Texas, where we
were from, talked to us, and he couldn’t understand that we just didn’t walk in and talk with
Coach Royal,” McKay says. “That would be like me going to play with rattlesnakes.
I’m smart enough to know that you don’t do that. Coach Royal was always nice, but he was Coach Royal. I didn’t stop in to shoot the shit. It wasn’t something you did for fun. I told
that kid I was in his office five times in my college career and four of them weren’t worth a damn.”
The fifth, McKay said, was late in the 1969 season when Royal called him in and told him he had been named
an All- American, but that he needed to keep it quiet until the official announcement.
At the Thanksgiving game at Texas A&M, Royal saw McKay’s parents after the game and congratulated
them. They asked why. Later, Royal approached McKay. “You
didn’t tell ’em?” “No, sir, you told me not to tell anybody, so I
didn’t tell anybody.” Royal’s authority was unquestioned. Yet by Texas standards,
Royal’s program struggled mightily from 1965 to 1967. At Texas, 6–4 records were abominable,
and that was their record in each of the three regular seasons. The Longhorns beat Mississippi after the
’66 season in the Bluebonnet Bowl to finish 7–4, but Royal vetoed any thought of going to a
bowl game after the ’67 season. The Longhorns didn’t deserve to go anywhere, he declared. It
really didn’t matter all that much that the Texas boosters—the men with the money and the influence—were applying heat, because Royal was plenty
hot himself. He
was going to do something about it, ordering that the 1968 spring training and the 1968 fall practices
be living hell. He didn’t even try to pretend it was something other than a test. The candy asses,
those who couldn’t take it, those who didn’t want it bad enough, were going to be gone, one way or another. “We were coming off three 6–4s,” Royal
says of the 1968 practices. “You bet it was hard. You always do that. You always had it stern enough
to find out who wanted to and who didn’t. Who wanted to late? Who wanted to when
you were behind? Who wanted to when they were tired? Who wanted to, when it would be easier to take a lazy
step or two? You have to push them hard enough to find that out.”
By 1968, Royal was ahead of his time in one area, disdaining water deprivation, which was a part of the
testing mechanism for so long, from coast to coast: In 1962, reserve sophomore guard Reggie Grob suffered
heatstroke during fall practice, went into a coma, and died four days before the season opener
in Austin against the Oregon Ducks. Royal’s angst was palpable, and he openly talked and agonized
about whether he and his staff should have been able to prevent Grob’s death.
“Coach Royal had gone through a tough time, when that kid had died,” guard Randy Stout says.
“We always had water, all the time.” In 1968, they weren’t thirsty, but
they were so sore they often couldn’t even make the walk from the stadium to the football dorm, or
vice versa, on the way to the second practice of the day in the fall, without stopping or lying down
to rest. Royal’s pride and his job were on the line, and if he was going to go down, he was going
to go down with the toughest. “I wasn’t surprised that it was that tough,”
Scott Henderson says of 1968 spring ball. “I was surprised that so
many guys quit and left. But Royal made it very clear it was going to be whoever wants to play.” Henderson had undergone knee
surgery after his freshman season, so he was watching the practices, not participating. The rehabilitation
from his surgery to repair a torn anterior cruciate ligament was difficult, but Henderson wasn’t
sure it was any worse than what he witnessed on the field. Bob McKay was
more certain. He had to drop out of spring ball to have rotator cuff surgery. “I swore to God, I
was the happiest man in the world when I got to go to the hospital.” Bill Zapalac, then a sophomore-to-be tight end who turned into
a star linebacker
for the ’69 team, says those spring drills were “hellacious, and they weeded out some of the
upperclassmen. I don’t know if it was intentional, but a lot of people quit.”
The survivors added it up: About thirty players quit, and about thirty more were hurt in spring ball. They
weren’t just the scrubs, either. Tommy Orr was expected to challenge to start at tackle. Gone. Jack Freeman, the guy
in the dorm room next to McKay, had played for Odessa Permian High School, where they were as tough
as they come. Gone. McKay managed to say goodbye, but star tight end Deryl Comer—McKay’s roommate—was
so drained he couldn’t even get up. Freeman understood. Comer himself “quit” during
spring drills, but came back after a day. Everyone understood that the staff wouldn’t have let him
come back—he paid for his impudence with extra sprints—if he had been a Turd Bowl regular. Survivors, such as undersized and unheralded guard Mike Dean, saw themselves
move up the depth chart without doing all that much except making it through practice and not throwing
up on Royal when he came down from the tower. “That was one of the most difficult times I have ever, ever had,” Ted Koy, eventually the cocaptain and starting right halfback for the 1969
team, says of the 1968 spring drills. “We would hit from the time we broke from calisthenics. Coach
Royal was going to go the next year with the survivors.” James Street,
a backup quarterback in 1967 as a sophomore, also was fortunate enough to miss the ’68 spring practices:
He was pitching for the Longhorns baseball team, under first-year head coach Cliff Gustafson. Street
came over to watch the football workouts and wince. He remembers Royal saying, “The circle’s
getting tighter, we’re losing a lot of players, but the ones staying here want to play ball.” Yes, that was 1968, but it was crucial in the development of the 1969 team. Royal
and the staff knew they had “The Worster Bunch”—featuring fullback Steve Worster—coming
into their sophomore years for the 1968 season, to go with a holdover starting quarterback, Bill Bradley.
The Texas coaches were pondering installing an offense that suited the prospects’ talents and also took advantage of the skills of the upperclassmen survivors. The fact that the Longhorns didn’t
come up with the new offense until after spring ball was one indication that those workouts primarily were
designed as a screening process. The
survivors had the guts to stick around, and they weren’t always the biggest and the most talented, but they had spunk and, in most
cases, brains. Sometimes it seemed sane young men wouldn’t have put up with the hell the Royal staff
put them through, but they did, and he was going to take advantage of the thinning ranks.
After that cornerstone ’68 spring training, Royal told his new offensive coach, Emory Bellard: Come up with
a scheme that takes advantage of what we’re gonna have left. As a high school head coach, Bellard won Texas state championships
at three different schools. After San Angelo High won the 1966 Class AAAA title under Bellard,
he finally made the jump to the college game, joining Royal’s staff as linebackers coach. Following
the third 6–4 season, Royal reorganized his staff, making Bellard the offensive backfield coach—effectively the coordinator. Bellard doodled and tinkered in his office for hours, pondering
splits and formations and pitchouts and belly rides and quarterback improvisations. He was
barely a year removed from coaching high school, yet he eventually went into the office of one of college football’s
legends and said: This is what we should do. Bellard
suggested a four-man backfield, a variation of the fullhouse “T” formation with the fullback within arm’s length of the
quarterback and the halfbacks a couple of yards back on each side. The “T”
had become a “Y,” and the basic triple-option play would start with the
quarterback “riding” the ball in the fullback’s belly before deciding—quickly— whether to more emphatically jam in a handoff, or pull the ball out and go down the line himself. Then the quarterback’s second and third options would
be to cut upfield himself or pitch out to the trailing halfback—the halfback
who had started on the other side of the formation. The basic formation would call
for a tight end on one side (the “strong” side), a split end on the other. “It took some guts on his part to do it,” Bellard says of Royal. “We
got a bunch of guys together who had completed their eligibility who were in summer school to look at it. One time, I played quarterback and another time I found one. I messed with it to see if the quarterback could do the things we were going to ask him to do, and I felt if I could do it, I knew darned well I
could teach it to an athlete.” In late July, James Street got
a call in his hometown of Longview. James, he was told, it might be a good idea to
be back in Austin by August 1, so you can be a part of the first look at a new offense. The introduction was low-key. “We were out there working out,” Street says, “and they said, ‘Let’s set up here and see how this works, see what y’all think about this.’” With the
fullback so close, the quarterbacks—Bill Bradley and Street— found it
impossible to “ride” the fullback long enough to survey the defensive reaction.
“Bradley and I kept saying we could do it,” Street says, “but neither
of us thought it would work. You just didn’t have enough time.” After
the coaches moved the fullback a yard farther back, the timing began to work. Street
and Bradley discovered the offense wasn’t complicated. All it required was
intuitive and intelligent reaction on the fly and taking care of the ball. The Longhorns had a terrific holdover halfback, Chris Gilbert, and putting both Steve Worster and Ted Koy—each previously listed as fullbacks— in the backfield
with Bradley and Gilbert was an astute deployment of resources, not just a strategic
wrinkle. The split end was going to be Charles “Cotton” Speyrer, a speedy
sophomore from Port Arthur who wasn’t able to play freshman football because
of shoulder surgery. He was a highly recruited running back in high school and wasn’t
sold on the position switch. “I thought that was a demotion because UT was
notorious for not passing the ball,” Speyrer says. “I had my head down
a little bit.” As it turned out, though, with the Longhorns overloaded with
running back talent, it was the best thing for Speyrer—and his future. Royal considered the wishbone a “modernization” of the Split-T he rode into coaching and up the ranks. “You make it a triple option instead of a double option,” Royal says. “It’s kind of unique that the side you’re running
the ball to, you can leave two guys totally unblocked and turn them loose.” Indeed, that was revolutionary: The offense allowed the reactions of one or two unblocked defensive players to help determine the quarterback’s decision. That freed an offensive lineman or two to charge and block elsewhere, going
after linebackers or defensive backs. There were variations, though:
On counter options, the fullback went one way
and the quarterback did a reverse pivot and headed the other. On simple power plays, the fullback led the way through the hole for the halfback, who took a handoff, or the halfback took a handoff from Street after the usual “belly” ride with Worster. Passes usually came off play-action fakes to the fullback, with Speyrer typically the primary receiver. Bellard
didn’t even think the offense was revolutionary enough to give it a pretentious
name: To him, it was a variation of the veer option offense, using three running
backs instead of two. He says the original name for the package was “right-left,”
which he thought emphasized that the triple-option principles could work to either
side—meaning not just right and left, but also to either the split-end or tight-end
side. To Bellard, that was “balance.” Bellard and the staff taught the
system to the Longhorns in the fall of 1968. And as with all experiments, there were
early problems that had to be worked out in games. Bradley struggled and lost the
No. 1 quarterback job after the Longhorns tied Houston 20–20 in the 1968 opener
(in front of the Houston writer Mickey Herskowitz, who coined the name “wishbone-T” for the Texas offense), and then lost 31–22 to Texas Tech in the second game. In that Tech loss, Worster, Gilbert, and Koy combined for over 300 yards
on the ground and Street replaced Bradley in the third quarter. Street was named
the starter in the middle of the next week, while Bradley’s handling of the
demotion earned him the respect of his teammates. When the change seemed imminent,
he broke the tension at practice by running pass patterns as a wide receiver, loosening
the cord on his sweatpants and allowing them to drop down in midroute. Within two
weeks, he was a full-time safety, where he almost immediately was one of the best
at the position in the country.
What was going on here? Three straight four-loss seasons, an 0–1–1 start, a
new offense, and a switch to an unproven quarterback? Was this time for panic, time
for the assistant coaches to get their résumés ready or hope that Royal
would get another job and take them with him if he got fired? But then
the Longhorns raced through the rest of the 1968 season undefeated, setting conference
records for total offense, rushing yardage, and average points in conference games.
Each week, as one of the senior leaders, Bradley would say something along the lines
of: “Don’t worry, boys, Rat’ll get it done,” “Rat”
being James Street, the little quarterback who replaced him. The Longhorns beat Arkansas,
finishing in a tie with the Razorbacks for
the Southwest Conference title and going to the Cotton Bowl because of the head-to-head victory. Texas drilled Tennessee 36–13 in that game,
finishing 9–1–1. Although Chris Gilbert’s career was over, the
Longhorns were certain their period of mediocrity had ended. And much of the optimism
was based on the success of the wishbone, and on the records of the backs returning for 1969. Horns, Hogs, and Nixon Coming page on this site
|